An unusual artifact observed on screening mammography in a patient with an LVAD.

PURPOSE: Screening mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis consist of high-resolution x-ray images to identify findings that are potentially indicative of breast cancer, enabling early detection and reduction of breast cancer mortality. Imaging artifacts can occasionally occur, sometimes due to patient-related medical devices. Because of continuous evolution of new technologies, there is potential for novel artifacts to be encountered. In this technical note, we report an unusual artifact in the screening mammogram of a patient with an Abbott HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device (LVAD). METHODS: A 72-year-old patient with a HeartMate 3 LVAD presented to our breast imaging facility for a standard screening exam with digital breast tomosynthesis (Selenia Dimensions, Hologic Inc., Bedford, MA) and synthetic 2D images (C-view, Hologic Inc., Bedford, MA). RESULTS: Linear artifacts oriented in the anteroposterior dimension demonstrating a spatial periodicity of ∼1.4 mm were seen on all left breast images, whereas concurrent right breast images did not demonstrate any artifacts. Repeat attempts using two identical digital breast tomosynthesis units demonstrated the same artifacts. No other exam at our imaging center that day demonstrated any such artifacts. Mammogram exams performed on this patient prior to her LVAD placement did not exhibit any similar artifacts. CONCLUSION: Findings support the patient's LVAD as the underlying source of linear artifacts observed on left breast images, particularly given the proximity of the LVAD to the left breast. With the number of patients receiving LVAD placement on the rise, as well as increasing median survival rates status post LVAD implantation, recognition of this LVAD related artifact on mammography may be important.

Predictors of response to endoscopic management of subglottic/tracheal stenosis in patients without tracheostomy.

INTRODUCTION: Subglottic and tracheal stenosis (SGTS) in adults is an acquired or idiopathic condition that can lead to dyspnea, and even life-threatening airway obstruction. Endoscopic techniques have advanced and largely eclipsed open surgery, with open surgery now reserved for refractory cases (Hseu et al., 2013; Feinstein et al., 2017). Currently, there is no accepted guideline for the endoscopic treatment of SGTS. Thus, the aim of the present study is to examine the impact of various clinical and pathological characteristics on outcomes to endoscopic treatment in a cohort of SGTS patients. DISCLOSURE: None of the authors have any financial or personal relationship that could cause a conflict of interest regarding this article. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed for 41 patients presenting with SGS without a tracheostomy over a 4-year-period (2018-2022), within a single tertiary care center. Quantitative outcomes including number of dilation procedures undergone and need for open procedures were examined. The qualitative variables included a history of pulmonary disease, prior tracheostomy/tracheal resection, presence of tracheomalacia, granulation tissue, excessive dynamic airway collapse (EDAC), and etiology of idiopathic subglottic stenosis. RESULTS: The presence of granulation tissue seen on tracheoscopy was associated with a higher number (4+) of dilation procedures (p = 0.01). A history of pulmonary disease (p = 0.037), the presence of tracheomalacia (p = 0.039), and the presence of granulation tissue (0.003) were all associated with a need for open procedures. CONCLUSION: Patients with the presence of granulation tissue, tracheomalacia, and a history of pulmonary disease were more associated with more severe disease requiring either a higher number of endoscopic procedures or need for open procedures.